Skip to main content

Hallelujah - Did Amazon Just Fix Their Review System?

So it looks like Amazon implemented a new policy with regards to product reviews. In order for someone to leave a review they must have spent $50 on Amazon since the creation of their Amazon account.

All I can say is Hallelujah!

This move, assuming Amazon actually enforces it and it's not merely a toothless tiger, will go a long way to shutting down the fake review business.

Obviously, it has drawbacks as some legitimate readers will not be able to leave reviews.  But as I said in a recent post, the review system is so broken that it was not only verging on being useless, but actually damaging Amazon's long-term viability as a business (which impacts everyone who sells on Amazon as well).

The things I'll be interested to see now are:

* Will the new filter apply retroactively?  It will be interesting to see if some books with say 50 reviews suddenly drop down to only having five.

* Will it adversely affect new authors? A lot of new authors generate traction with readers by giving one of their books away for free or heavily discounted. Customers picking up books this way may be financially strapped and not able to meet the $50 threshold.  So will new authors, who desperately need reviews, find it even more difficult to get them?

* This doesn't change the lower-level scams, it merely addresses the "review farms". The system can still be scammed, just that now a vendor will need a legitimate Amazon customer to leave fake reviews.

* Finally, will this tip the scale in favor of traditional publishers who can easily afford to scam the system as I mention above. They have the financial resources, as well as the employees, to simply buy 50 or 100 copies of a book and leave glowing reviews.

* Will the $50 limit simply make the fake review game more expensive? Are the scammers willing to create multiple accounts with $50 of spend on them just to leave a good review? For higher-end products (not ebooks, but things that cost say $500+, I could definitely see them doing so).

So is this the panacea we've been waiting for? No, it's not.

Is it a step in the right direction though? Most definitely. So much so that it's hopefully a harbinger for future actions Amazon might take to protect the efficacy of their review system.

Is it unfair in certain circumstances, taking away the voice of some legitimate reviews? It is.

But, desperate times call for desperate measures.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...