Skip to main content

Hyundai screws up big time with new ad

I guess Hyundai thought it was being clever, but their new ad blew up in their face big time. The ad depicts a man committing suicide in his ix35 Hyundai car, but ultimately failing because the car doesn't emit carbon monoxide but rather water vapor.


Now can you ever make a funny ad using suicide? Sure, anything can be made to be funny.  Bridgestone did such an ad years ago....



Bridgestone was smart though. First they used a dog. Second they kept it sort of light. Third, you cheered for the dog when the car stops.

Where Hyundai screwed up is the ad is too damn realistic. The viewer knows that there are people who commit suicide that way and the tone and ambiance of the commercial is probably what their last moments are actually like. When you create that sense of realism you can't then flip-the-script at the very end and expect people to find it funny.

As to be expected the ad upset some people who had actually lost their father to suicide in such a fashion.

Way to give your brand a black eye Hyundai.

Comments

  1. In the world of thermodynamics and mathematics, it is wasteful to do things that are by the laws of the universe physically impossible. You cannot:
    1.Divide by zero
    2.Know the absolute last digit of Pi
    3.Set either water or a school on fire
    4.Kill yourself
    8.Change unambiguous past history in the next few minutes.
    9.Cut a Mobius strip down the middle and have 2 Mobius strips.
    10.Destroy heat and cause it to cease to exist.

    I killed myself on November 12,2001 and I already have figured out what happens. Your life is replaced by a near-identical life in a different universe save for a more damaged body and your loved ones in the first life's universe mourn your death. When you cut the Mobius strip you only cut it back into one. When you die with a body that's still useable according to your deity you go on still living on an identical Earth in an identical universe. It's turtles all the way down. Pity those people who aren't religious who will end up, possibly moved off of the Earth once the Sun has ran out of fuel, in a universe all alone by themselves with everyone else who has ever lived (extraterrestrials too) now dead. Thus the problem isn't worrying about dying, but instead keeping the life entertaining. And if it's too boring there's no way out except through mythology/religion.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...