Skip to main content

Want to send a message? Cyprus showed the world how it's done

If you haven't heard about what is going on in Cyprus I suggest you take a moment to read Ron Paul's commentary - The Great Cyprus Bank Robbery - which gives a pretty concise overview of the situation. 

In essence the bank went bankrupt, the bank turned to the government, the government turned to the ECB (European Central Bank) and the ECB told them to take depositors' money. And so they did - some depositors will lose six per cent, some 14 per cent and some will lose 60-to-80 per cent of their deposits. 

What a bloody mess. 

I think this may be the first time that a bank has gone in and literally taken a percentage of depositors chequing or savings accounts. In any other circumstance this would be, without question, stealing. The only reason it's not considered stealing here is that it's not stealing when the government takes something from you (I don't know what it is, but legally, it's not considered stealing).  

From a PR perspective this was an idiotic move, but man-oh-man talk about sending a message. 

With this one action Cyprus has changed the rules of the game. The message has been sent around the world:  If, a government or systemically essential bank is facing bankruptcy, it is acceptable to consider as an option the confiscation of people's wealth.

Think about what that means... it means the ultimate punishment for savers. If you save your money and put it in the bank, and the bank gets in trouble, they might take your savings. They won't take your house, or your car, or your pension (yet)... but they will take your savings. 

So those who behaved most responsibly in society (ie. those who saved their money) will be stolen from first. 

In addition, with Europe being a total mess right now, Cyprus has sent the message to Italians, the Irish, and every other nation that you better get your money OUT of the bank while you still can. 

Anyway, this move has sent a message heard around the world: Your money is only YOUR money so long as WE (bankers and the government) say it is. 

On a lighter note, I found the following commentary on the Cyprus fiasco interesting to watch (note: excessive profanity present in video)


Some additional commentary on Cyprus that is interesting/informative:





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes
Post a Comment
Read more

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...
3 comments
Read more

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...
Post a Comment
Read more