Skip to main content

RIM changes name to Blackberry - please contain your shock and excitment

Forgot to mention this in my earlier post on the launch of BB10, but Research in Motion has now changed its name to Blackberry.

I guess this was the big branding mystery that the company was eluding to months ago.

RIM will now trade under the ticket symbol BB on the TSX.

Not really sure what this accomplishes myself. I get the notion of a fresh start and leaving the old RIM brand behind. But was RIM's problem ever the name RIM?  Or rather has it always been poor marketing and a product that got behind the curve (no pun intended)?

I mean, can you imagine Apple deciding to call itself iPhone instead of Apple?
Or what if Microsoft decided to be called Windows from now on?

I don't think the name change will do any harm per se, but I don't see any benefit in it either.  And it's a lot of hassle for no real benefit. The amount of paper work, legal costs and marketing overhaul that is required to get rid of the RIM name is quite a bit (far more than people might suspect). Far too much if you aren't getting any real benefit from doing so.

If I had to take a stab in the dark though, I suspect they dropped the RIM brand to be a more appealing acquisition target down the road. When the time comes, whoever buys RIM won't have to worry about absorbing the RIM (corporate) brand. Instead, they'll simply absorb the product brand, Blackberry.

But again, I don't really think that a company would or would not acquire RIM just because of it's name.

My other thought was that this was the idea of someone on the board. 'We need a clean break from the past, let's dump the name RIM and just call ourselves Blackberry. We need to be seen as a start-up, not some company from the 90s.' To which everyone probably nodded and said 'Um, sure, why not.'

In one regard this is another troubling sign that RIM thinks changing its name will help things, that if they just make a 'clean break' then they'll have a 'fresh' start.

Sorry guys, doesn't work that way. There's not a single customer out there whose reason for not buying a blackberry was that your corporate name was RIM, that was never the issue.

Now, one company who probably should have renamed themselves was BP (British Petroleum). If ever there was a time for a brand overhaul, it was after the oil spill in the gulf.  In that instance I could have seen some potential benefit to the name change.

Anyway, I'm sure a lot of folks are going to have to work overtime to do all the stuff that needs to be done when a company changes its name, which is too bad since there's no real benefit in doing so.









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...