Skip to main content

New GOP ad goes hard at Obama

The GOP released an attack ad on Obama today.


While the ad is somewhat effective in painting Obama as an 'off the cuff' president focused on re-election as opposed to doing his job, I think the GOP are straying off track with their message.

The only thing that matters is JOBS.

Every time the GOP talk about something else they water down the resonant value of when they do talk about jobs.

The gutsy part of this video however was inserting George W. Bush in there and suggesting that even Bush took the job more seriously than Obama is taking it. It's clever in that most people now highly dislike Bush, so if you can somehow re-classify Obama as being in the "Bush league" of American Presidents, you start to chip away at the idolatry that Obama enjoys.

The ad is fair criticism in that I think it's possible, if not entirely likely, that Obama chose to go on The View as opposed to meet with world leaders because if he's going to be re-elected he has to shore up the women's vote and The View speaks to that audience.

Having said that, it's nothing but sideshow material. The GOP should be hammering the jobs message over and over.

In fact, what they should be doing is clipping together criticisms of Obama by prominent folks on the left, showing that many folks who are IN Obama's camp have been let down by his presidency.

For instance, Matt Damon, who is a progressive Liberal I believe, has bashed Obama regularly...


and this in contrast with the fact that Damon actively supported Obama in his 2008 campaign bid...


What the GOP needs to stay focused on is convincing people that it is OK to be upset with Obama. That's he's not the second coming and that he should be judged not based on his soaring rhetoric but rather his job performance.

So the GOP ad, while effective for what it was trying to do, is kind of off-track at the same time. Everything should be about jobs and the economy, because that's the only thing most voters will be thinking about when they cast their ballot.

To the extent that you do go off that message, it should only be to re-enforce a message that there are plenty of folks who have dissented from Obama who were his biggest supporters four years ago. This gives Obama supporters permission - allows them to give themselves permission - to cut loose of the Obama train.

As always, none of this means Romney will be any better, but from a PR perspective the GOP needs to focus 100 per cent of its messaging strategy on jobs and the economy to really have a chance at usurping Obama.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...