Skip to main content

Shocking: 1,000 suicides due to recession in the UK

A shocking study out of the UK has found that there have been an additionally 1,000 suicides in the UK between 2008-2010 above what pre-recession trending would have resulted in.

Just as shocking is that in the US military, active soldiers are now committing suicide at a rate of one soldier per day. More soldiers are dying from suicide now than from actual combat.

Politicians who like to preach that things aren't great but they are getting better need to keep in mind that they aren't.

Forget unemployment stats (which are rigged anyway, yet currently stand at 8.3 per cent), forget net worth statistics (which in the US show a 40 per cent drop in individual net worth since 2008), forget a broken stock market (which while going up is seeing company after company getting slaughtered, RIM, Zynga, Facebook, etc.)... forget all those 'metrics' which clearly show things are not getting better.

Just look at the suicide rate. Nothing measures the sense of 'hope and hopelessness' better than that. And in the UK we are seeing a massive rise.

In 2010 there were 5,608 suicides. If approximately 500 of them, according to the UK study, were above what would have occurred if we had not gone in to recession, that's nearly a 10 per cent rise suicides (which is insane in an industrialized nation where really there's no reason that anyone should feel as though they have to kill themselves given help is/should be available).

Jamie Dimon, CEO, JP Morgan Chase
Not to mention it's probably safe to assume those numbers have remained elevated, or have gotten even worse, in 2011 and 2012... which would add another 1,000 suicides which would otherwise have not occurred without the recession. So just in the UK alone, from 2008-2012, it's conservative to estimate that at least 2,000 (additional) people have killed themselves as a result of this recession (extrapolate those trends worldwide and far more people have died from this recession than in the September 11 terrorist attacks - which is why I personally feel that the banksters (at least the TBTF banks) are far worse than Al Qaeda ever was.

To make matters even worse, it's a commonly accepted epidemiological fact that for every person who successfully commits suicide there are 10-20 others who attempt and fail (or are saved before completion) - although some statistics rate the ratio of successful attempts to failed attempts at 1:33.

So while an addition 2,000 people in the UK have checked out, its safe to assume that 20,000-40,000 (and perhaps as high as 69,000) have attempted to do so but failed or were saved.

Point is, it's clear that things have not gotten better. 

From a PR perspective, this is why populations around the world are losing faith in their leaders. Because while society is crumbling around the average Joe, the politicians continue to use 'optimistic' messaging.

Optimism is great, but telling someone who has been shot that it's nothing but a scratch is not optimistic, it's delusional, and the person who has been shot knows it.

Politicians should be talking more about the fact that the world is still in crisis and that we need to start tackling the situation as a crisis. Instead they find whatever piece of tiny good news they can and hang their messaging hat on that.

The 'people' though simply see this as being utterly disconnected with the hardships that are occurring in society.

An 'ivory' tower approach to public relations, I've always felt, dooms you in the long run. An 'in the trenches' approach, I've always felt, while tougher, sets you up for success in the long run. Knowing what people are going through and addressing their real concerns is what good PR is about. Merely pumping messages that YOU think sound good, with the belief that if it sounds good to you it will sound good to others, is a bad messaging strategy.

My prediction is that many politicians are going to find themselves booted out of office over the coming years precisely because of an ivory tower approach to PR. Optimism is great when in the early stages of a crisis, but at a certain point, when things remain bad enough long enough, you have to 'get real' with your messaging or risk becoming severely disconnected with your audience.

The sad thing is, if politicians were more truthful about the extent of the crisis we are in, I believe it's possible that some of those people who killed themselves may have hung on. Being honest about things is what creates a sense of hope. Being disingenuous, if not out-right deceptive, actually adds to people's sense of 'hopelessness' because when their leaders aren't acknowledging their hardships, they begin to feel like there's no hope that things will get better if those responsible for fixing the problems don't acknowledge the extent of how bad the problems are.

So in my humble opinion, (bad) PR has played a role in those people's deaths, if only in contributing to their sense of hopelessness.








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...