Skip to main content

Conrad Black rescues kittens

Kittens that Conrad Black saved
I'll give it Conrad Black, man he is a good writer.

In a recent op-ed piece in the National  Post he writes about how he and his wife saved two kittens who were trapped in some kind of storm drain on his property.

From a PR perspective, this shows that Conrad is a sharp guy when it comes to PR because rescuing kittens is pretty much a sure fire way to ingratiate yourself back in to the public's good books.

People (at least some) may still feel Black is a crook, but with moves like this they start think of him as a 'nice-guy crook', which is a major step towards shaking the 'crook' brand all together. One of the best ways to shake a negative brand is to implement cognitive dissonance, which is to say if the viewer holds two opposing views of your brand that contradict each other - such as in this case the views of 'nice guy' and 'crook' - then they move from being solidly biased against you to being open minded, as their mind seeks out more information to assess which of the contradictory views is more likely to be the true trait of the person or business.

Ironically, this is something that Mitt Romney fails to get. Romney donates a lot of money, millions, every year, yet he hardly ever talks about it. If he were to talk about that more it would create cognitive dissonance among those who dislike him -  He's a cut-throat venture capitalist who will do anything to make buck, but hey, wait a second, he gives away millions at the same time, just who is this guy? 

But what's more impressive about Black is just how good a writer he is. When reading his recounting of events you feel like you are reading a novel as opposed to an op-ed piece.

Thumbs up to Conrad on the PR front for having the insight to realize that human interest stories are an excellent way of rebuilding your brand, and furthermore, thumbs up on such a well written op-ed (very few PR folks, much less non-PR folks, whether they be CEO's or not, can write as eloquently as Black).

For the back story on Conrad Black and how he went from press barron to spending over three years in jail, you can view a lengthy Vanity Fair piece written in 2011.

Comments

  1. Conrad Black was a victim of our narrowly held media where the rich and powerful decide how all or most of us will think. Remember the pictures they posted where Conrad had a bit of a sneer on his face. Notice that they didn't post any pictures of him smiling? Ever wonder about that as the man has a wonderful sense of humour.
    Conrad Black is one of Canada's most successful people and he should be treated as such.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't know enough about Conrad to make any kind of informed judgement on his character, but you do bring up a very interesting point.

    Conrad 'looks' like that mean old nasty baron tycoon. He does fit the stereotype image perfectly. Combine that with the fact that the guy obviously has a genius level intellect (you'd have to, to write the way he does), and you get that distant yet pious impression (ie. cold) formed quite easily.

    The thing that you have to be careful of if you fit a stereotype (and it's no one's fault if you do.. just good or bad luck of the draw) is that the media will latch on to it. So you have to work to ensure that stereotype (if it's potentially negative) doesn't become your brand.

    Hence why the kitten story struck me as very wise on Conrad's part. It's unfortunate that all this had to happen though for him to realize the benefit of incorporating a softer-side to his brand.

    But then again, through the early-and-mid 2000's it was a badge of honour to be seen as that 'tough industrious entrepreneur'. Not many CEO's with that brand where doing anything to soften that image.

    With regards to being treated as successful, I'm kind of indifferent to that. In the end, those who fall from grace still enjoy lives of far more luxury than 99 per cent of Canadians. So a life of luxury isn't too bad a consolation price (most people would gladly be seen negative in exchange for that).

    That said, these outcomes are 100 per cent - not 99 per cent, 100 per cent - avoidable if you take care of your brand and position your brand not just for today, but for unforeseen events in the future as well.

    Thanks for the comment =)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

A Look Back on 2017 / A Look Forward to 2018

Hard to believe it's been two years (and six books) since I started publishing. Thought I'd take a moment to look back on the journey, some of the highlights and what's in store for the future. Eyes Wide Open I had no idea what this publishing path would be like - I went in blind with nothing more than an interest in telling a story. It turned out to be way harder than I could have imagined. You'd think writing a book wouldn't be that difficult, but it is. It's not so much the book that readers see that's hard to produce, it's the ideas and writing that get left on the cutting room floor. But beyond the actual stories, learning Photoshop to do my own covers, understanding how to market my books, learning how to create print versions, and a dozen other things really opened my eyes to how much effort is required to get a book to market. Along the way I’ve had my moments where I questioned my sanity to put myself through the process. But...

Pew Research says Press Credibility In Decline

According to Pew Research negative opinions about the press are at an all time high. Definitely check out the source article because they have a ton of infographics that are worth looking at. The main graph related to the research is the one below: As you can see, the public no longer views the media as unbiased or fully accurate. There are dozens of variables that play in to this phenomena, but I think the biggest one is that the public has traditionally viewed the media as doing the people's work. Which is to say, they are kind of like the FBI, but they work for the people not the government. They are suppose to root out what is going on and inform the people so that society can hold politicians and corporations accountable (note the reoccuring theme of accountability that I talk about often in this blog, because it's a causal variable behind much of the issues in the world today). Over the past 15 or so years, the press has lost it's credibility with the p...