Skip to main content

Another example of how RIM isn't dead... first time Android has pissed me off!

So my Google Nexus just got updated to Jelly Bean a few days ago and at first it seemed like there were no problems. Nothing new and great, but no issues either.

However, there's a massive problem now, the battery drain is twice what it was on Ice Cream Sandwich. I'm lucky to get a full day out of the phone.

What's worse is my mother has the same phone (who is not a techie and goes nuts when tech doesn't work because she doesn't understand it) and it's being drained at four times the rate of Ice Cream Sandwich.

Which means she has to go in to the Wind store and get them to fix it if they can.  I'm going to fiddle around with a hard reboot and see if that helps any, but man, what a pain in the butt. Cutting my battery life in half with a new OS is beyond annoying and for the first time, I'm genuinely pissed at Google.

But that's nothing compared to what my mother feels. Her exact words "WHAT?! I have to go to the store?". And when I told her that it's no big deal, if the phone is screwed on the new OS they would give her a new phone, her reply was 'NO! Oh come on! I'm not re-inputting everything in to a new phone! It took forever to input all my information, I'm not doing that again!"

So she is 100 times more pissed at Google than I am.  I can say that if there isn't a way to fix this battery issue and she has to get a new phone, it will not be an Android phone. I'll stick with Google for the time being, but I'm definitely annoyed.

This is just another example, in my opinion, where people who think RIM is guaranteed dead are nuts, because there is still not a smartphone on the market that is 100 per cent reliable.

With every upgrade comes the potential that the OS will make your phone a near useless brick.

Every OS out there has problems. Remember when if you cradled your iPhone the wrong way it would cut your phone call off?

Whoever is the first to come up with a truly reliable OS with excellent battery life will destroy even Apple.

Could it BB10? Who knows, it might be. But my point is RIM is not dead just yet, not with crap like Jelly Bean on the market.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...