Skip to main content

Stop The Trap campaign - worth a look if you value your Internet

So we finally thought we were through all the hoopla regarding the Internet in Canada right? Usage Based Billing got shot down and the carriers were held back from jacking Internet prices up.

No sooner can you sigh a breath of relief than the Internet comes under attack yet again.

This time it's in conjunction with the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Huffington Post has a story on how the TPP has Internet regulations that all participating countries would have to abide by. Which would mean that Canadians would become subject to the Internet laws determined primarily by the United States (although technically by the TPP as a whole).

Open Media, the folks who helped stopped the Usage Based Billing efforts of Canadian carriers, has launched a campaign called Stop The Trap. Folks can sign the petition, just like what was done to oppose Usage Based Billing, and government leaders will get a message saying you oppose non-Canadian powers regulating Canadian Internet usage.

I don't know how other Canadians feel, but the last thing I'd want is the current US government regulating anything to do with Canadian society, much less the Internet. 

I know folks in the US who if they download a single file off Bit Torrent get warnings from their service provider saying if they are caught doing so again they face criminal legal action being taken against them. 

Is this really what it's coming to? Where Big Brother - ie. the government - watches our every move just waiting for a reason to slap some fine on us? 

I hope Harper backs away from the TPP if this is the case. While he may need to pursue this for Canada's economic benefit in the short term, Canadians will go absolutely ape-shit (pardon the French) the moment they start getting 'warnings' or 'fines' or lose their Internet because some international tribunal decided they had done something they didn't agree with like downloading an mp3 or something.  

Mark my words, this has the potential to be a HUGE PR disaster for the Conservatives (bigger than the Usage Based Billing issue was - and I did not vote for Harper, even though I kind of wanted to, because of UBB and because the CRTC was clearly either a corrupt or incompetent organization that Harper should have cleaned up and never did). 

If Harper signs away Canadian authority over the Internet, it's 100 per cent guaranteed the Conservatives will not get my vote. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...