Skip to main content

Would there be PR in a bartering economic system?

This recent story about Greece made me think.

Apparently some folks in Greece are by-passing the Euro and/or the Drachma and using a currency they created call Tem, which is used to barter for goods and services.


It made me wonder what would the value of PR be in such a system?

I suspect at first the system would be built on small operations. Families or individuals selling a specific good or service. Then over time, those who were most successful would end up with surplus 'Tem' which they would probably use to buy other small vendors, forming a corporation of sorts.

At this point, to grow market share they would need to develop a brand. In order to develop said brand, they would need to communicate with their stakeholders. This would mean positioning their offering, extolling the benefits to customers and managing negative events that could damage their brand - in essence they would be engaged in PR.

But would PR have a role in the  beginning stages? Probably not.

Or perhaps it would. Perhaps PR folks would barter their services in exchange for goods and services and actually be the deciding factor in which of these nascent businesses flourished. Perhaps they would be the 'king makers' in such a marketplace.

But they could just as easily find themselves left out in the cold.

They would definitely have to generate the business as small barter businesses would be hard pressed initially to see the value in giving you say bananas in exchange for helping them develop and promote a brand.  They would more logically want to barter their bananas in exchange for something they physically need, say home renovations or apples or a mule, you get the point.

Either way though, I think it would be a fascinating world to live in for a while. A much more personalized form of business that would play well to PR's core principles.

Anyway, just food for thought. If Bernanke does QE3 and QE4 and QE5 and successfully destroys the US dollar (and by association all world currencies) we may all be living in a barter system soon.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...