Skip to main content

How much can the US military's brand take?

The thing about the US military is that it has successfully integrated the concept of patriotism with the industrial military complex.

It does this through a very simple slogan of 'Support the Troops'. If you support the troops, you by extension support the generals, politicians and companies that cumulative comprise the 'war machine' that is the US military.

For people to psychologically turn their back on the industrial military complex they feel as though they are turning their backs on the troops and by extension their very country.

Yet, one has to ask, despite it's incredibly strong brand as described above, just how much can the military's brand take before it is damaged beyond repair?

We've had Abu Ghraib.
We've had the soldier that attacked women and children in Afghanistan.
We've had a recent story on how most soldiers are psychotropic drugs to deal with depression and other disorders.

And now, perhaps worst of all, a video has been leaked of Blackwater soldiers (these are private soldiers that the army contracts) behaving atrociously.

[warning: disturbing images in this video]


From a brand perspective, the US military has really pushed its luck engaging in a 10-year war. While much of the public still stands behind the military, these kinds of videos have got to be damaging in terms of public opinion.

It's very hard to position yourself as liberators when videos such as this show troops engaged in horrendous behavior towards the (non combative) civilian population.

When this is all over (the wars that is), I suspect the military will have to engage in a massive and prolonged PR campaign to regain the trust and respect of the public.  Their only other alternative is to keep their current campaign of fear going - we are your protectors, the terrorists will kill you if we don't defend you. And let us hope that message doesn't last for the next 20 years, because it's not a healthy state for a society to exist in.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...