Skip to main content

How much can the US military's brand take?

The thing about the US military is that it has successfully integrated the concept of patriotism with the industrial military complex.

It does this through a very simple slogan of 'Support the Troops'. If you support the troops, you by extension support the generals, politicians and companies that cumulative comprise the 'war machine' that is the US military.

For people to psychologically turn their back on the industrial military complex they feel as though they are turning their backs on the troops and by extension their very country.

Yet, one has to ask, despite it's incredibly strong brand as described above, just how much can the military's brand take before it is damaged beyond repair?

We've had Abu Ghraib.
We've had the soldier that attacked women and children in Afghanistan.
We've had a recent story on how most soldiers are psychotropic drugs to deal with depression and other disorders.

And now, perhaps worst of all, a video has been leaked of Blackwater soldiers (these are private soldiers that the army contracts) behaving atrociously.

[warning: disturbing images in this video]


From a brand perspective, the US military has really pushed its luck engaging in a 10-year war. While much of the public still stands behind the military, these kinds of videos have got to be damaging in terms of public opinion.

It's very hard to position yourself as liberators when videos such as this show troops engaged in horrendous behavior towards the (non combative) civilian population.

When this is all over (the wars that is), I suspect the military will have to engage in a massive and prolonged PR campaign to regain the trust and respect of the public.  Their only other alternative is to keep their current campaign of fear going - we are your protectors, the terrorists will kill you if we don't defend you. And let us hope that message doesn't last for the next 20 years, because it's not a healthy state for a society to exist in.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...