Skip to main content

Best Buy closes 50 stores....ouch

It's hard not to acknowledge that the world is changing rapidly.... and for the worse it seems.

The traditional cycle of creative destruction seems to have become a cycle of... well... destruction.

Last week Best Buy announced it was axing 400 jobs and closing 50 stores in an effort to save $800M.

It's hard to find a success story as good as Best Buy. I mean, they are in every city and town selling the latest in technology, who would have thought they'd be falling apart as they are? I remember years ago, if you wanted something technology related, you went to Best Buy.

The truth is that they have become uncompetitive with Amazon. Just the other day I bought a Logitech keyboard. The price at Best Buy was $89.99. The price at TigerDirect was $89.99. The price at Amazon? On sale for $45.99 (although today it would cost you $79.99).



Not to mention with Amazon I don't have to get in the car and go to the store. I was also amazed at how they delivered the keyboard to my door in three days (I took their regular, no-cost shipping option and it still arrived that fast!).

From a PR perspective, Best Buy has entered the worst brand position you can possibly be in - when your very name contradicts your business. "Best" Buy is anything but the best price or selection, hence it is by definition not the best buy.

How does Best Buy get itself out of this mess? The answer unfortunately doesn't come from PR, because there is little PR can do at this point. The role of PR in this mess was to have identified that the company's brand and its actual business reality were beginning to diverge at some point. That's your biggest warning sign that troubling times are ahead, when what you are saying does not match up with what you are doing.

Best Buy needs to completely overhaul its business and start asking itself what do customers want? The answer is they want the best price and access to the latest and greatest in technology. Currently, Best Buy offers a truly pitiful selection of technology almost all of which is over priced.

Even the keyboard I bought, if I had gone to Best Buy (assuming I was willing to pay twice as much) odds are they wouldn't even have had it in stock in the store.

If Best Buy cannot transform itself in to the Costco of technology then it is doomed and Amazon will eat its breakfast, lunch and dinner over the long run.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...