Skip to main content

Steve Jobs' bio redefines how we see Jobs?

I'm always hesitant to view anyone as standing head and shoulders above the rest of the human race.

There are a couple of people in history who probably fit that category - Albert Einstein, Marcus Aurelius, Mahatma Gandhi - that's about all I can think of.

There are lots of people who accomplish amazing things, but that doesn't mean they aren't like everyone else, they often are!

The bits and pieces that have come out about Steve Jobs the past week, including the fact that he refused surgery that could have potentially saved his life and instead went with 'herbs and vegetables', shows that Jobs wasn't some super human whose frontal cortex was from the year 3055.



He was a genius, he built the most successful tech company in the world, yet, it appears, that he was fundamentally the same as everyone else in that he was prone to the same internal struggle that most people face, balancing critical thinking versus emotive thinking.

Apple changed the world and for that Jobs was a titan of industry, yet it's clear that he had his flaws as well.

I don't think that makes him less amazing. If anything, I think that's what makes him amazing. To be essentially human (and flawed) like everyone else yet to have changed the world nonetheless. It's a testament that our future is not, and never will be, dependent on super human individuals, merely individuals who have a vision and who find a way to try and make that vision a reality. The rest is all horseshoes and four-leaf clovers if you ask me.

It's interesting to watch how the media praised Jobs as some ubermensch and yet two weeks later they begin to slowly pick away at the very persona they helped to create with reports that he could be cruel to employees at times, that he didn't give much to charity, that he had no interest in knowing his biological father, etc.

I don't know, maybe he wasn't the nicest guy, maybe he was (hopefully the biography coming out will separate the man from the myth).

Either way, I'll be happy if Jobs' legacy gets a little rust on it if only because it's far more inspirational to know that success (which Apple is the epitome of today) doesn't hinge on perfection.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...