Skip to main content

Occupy Wall Street, starting to get interesting....

Mayor Bloomberg warned of impending riots and the recent Occupy Wall Street protest may foreshadow such an event.

The protest started off with only a couple hundred people last week (your usually assortment of hippie-esque protestors) and went unnoticed for the most part. However, after a week now, the number of protestors seems to be growing and YouTube is now starting to get a constant stream of videos regarding the event.

I've talked about video becoming more and more important in marketing / communicating anything. Just as important is the video editing software which is allowing people to add music and audio tracks to their video, creating more compelling viewing experiences (see the video below at mark 3:00 for an example of this).

The video below shows the police are starting to crack down on the occupy protest. While video of police managing a protest always looks 'dramatic' what's interesting here is that the 'occupation' has officially become a spectacle, which is usually when such protests start to draw in ever increasing numbers.

We'll see what happens over the next week, they'll either have locked up enough of the protestors that the occupation will come to an end, or I suspect the crowd will simply double or triple in size.

You have to give it to the protestors, this at first didn't get any media attention (in fact the media laughed at how few protestors there were). But through persistence (the protestors simply did not go away) they are now getting people's attention.

From a PR perspective there's something to be said about persistence - get in people's faces long enough and you'll become a media story.  Gandhi's hunger strike garnered endless media coverage and actually ended the war between Pakistan and India at that time, all through nothing but the public display of persistence.

If the police had been smart on the PR front (which they rarely are, because PR isn't their job) they would have handed out water to the protestors in the days prior. This would have showed that they weren't against the protestors. Then, when they had to break the protest up, it would be harder to make the police look like simply the strong arm of the law if there was video of them being 'kind' to the protestors only days earlier. 

It's always the images of peaceful demonstrators being manhandled by the police that cause more protestors to show up.



d

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...