Skip to main content

Obama's new tag line "Warrior for the middle class"

You know, the other day I talked about 'superhero' campaigning. Right on queue Obama comes out today and says:

If asking a billionaire to pay the same tax rate as a plumber or teacher makes me a warrior for the middle class, I'll wear that charge as a badge of honor.

You can read the full story here.

I'm sorry, but it's really laughable that three years in to his presidency he is now calling himself a 'warrior', when even his own base sees him as someone who sits on the fence more often than not and who tries to be seen as the 'compromiser in chief'.  If he was really this so called 'warrior of the middle class' where was he when he first took office when it came to the middle class?
 
More to the point, why keep pretending like taxing the wealthy is going to create jobs. As I've said before, I don't care if you increase taxes on the wealthy, but it's dishonest to act like doing so will have any significant impact on unemployment or the deficit.

Yet again though, read the PR tea leaves. The fact that he is now using words like 'warrior' tell you everything you need to know about what his messaging strategy is going to be over the next 12 months. He's going to do his best to establish himself as the 'defender of the people' and the only way to do that is going to be to villify the wealthy and congress (specifically the republicans). 
 
I think politicians should officially ditch the suit and tie and just start wearing spandex. If you want to pretend you are a superhero then you might as well go all the way =)





Anyway, I think he needs a new PR team. What we need is less mud-slinging and more confidence building. Americans don't want a 'warrior' they want jobs, they want to see their 401ks go up, they want to be able to buy a house (or in many cases, sell their house without going in to debt because it's underwater).

If you want to 'fight' against something, instead of wasting time fighting the wealthy, fight unfair trade tarrifs, wall street corruption, political campaign contributions, lobbying, etc.

Essentially clean up Washington like you said you were going to do.

James Carville wasn't so far off in offering Obama some good advice:

1. Fire a lot of people
2. Indict people
3. Stick to your rationale for decisions made and to be made in the future

If Obama had worked a single day in the corporate world he'd know this is exactly how a corporation responds when it's falling apart. 

Case in point, HP just fired its CEO and announced Meg Whitmey will be the new CEO.

But Obama keeps coming at this like a tenure-driven university professor where no one ever gets fired, strategies never change and people 'fight it out' in academic debates and papers. 

Oh well, I can't wait for Obama to compare the republicans to Dr. Doom or Magneto or some other such super villian.

Maybe the PR guys over at the World Wrestling Federation will be in high demand from political campaigns as we get closer to the 2012 elections. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...