Skip to main content

I pledge allegiance to.... China?

Looks like Italy might have their bacon saved by China.  The two countries are in talks to sell Italian debt to China (sparking hope that we might avoid a Great Depression globally).

One has to almost chuckle over China buying up all this debt. I mean, we're talking about a communist country that subjects its citizens to slave labor-like conditions and wages. So of the 20 dollars of revenue the worker produces in a day, the government keeps 18 dollars and the worker keeps 2 dollars (I don't know that those are the figures, but I'm assuming it's something along those ratio lines).

Then the government takes the 18 dollars and uses it to buy up the debt of countries who are living high on the hog without paying as they go (in part to keep their export trade going, but also, I'm sure, to keep those countries from getting too vocal about Chinese activities they may not agree with).

From what I can tell this essentially equates to developed nations being bailed out by people who are treated like slaves. 

Thankfully, depending on how you look at it (thankfully only if you are getting bail outs, not if you are a Chinese citizen), the strict control over information in China keeps the population from ever realizing that they are propping up other countries off their hard work. If the masses realized that they were living a low standard of living so that Americans and Italians (among others) could keep living a high standard of living (as a result of deficit spending off-loaded to China), it's safe to say a revolution would be a real risk.

I have to admit, it's really odd to be living in a time where a country once condemned for being communist and having horrible human rights practices, is the one saving the day (although one has to wonder at what cost down the road?).

Anyway, from a PR perspective, as horrible as this is to say, China takes the cake. By buying up everyone's debt they've basically silenced all critical voices the world may have of them. Even those not being bailed out are hushed in the realization that at some point they too may have to turn to China to save themselves.

Anyway, I stumbled on this very cool infographic which is a year or so old, but still a great representation of China's stake in US debt (I love infographics... I wish more organizations put the effort in to created them... they are almost works of art in my opinion and are great for communicating an idea). 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...