Skip to main content

The danger of social media - Rich Mock Protestors (or did they?)

A video recently came out of a group of suposedly rich people watching the Wall Street protestors from a balcony above while they enjoyed champagne and laughing at the protest (starts at 50 second mark).




Now, I have no clue who those people actually were, for all we know they aren't rich at all but rather were simply at an after-work function or a wedding reception. Plenty of average folks dress up and can look 'rich' for special occasions.

Heck, for all we know the guy in the video who was laughing had just finished telling his buddy "Those wall street fat cats are really going to get it now."

In fact, most rich people wouldn't find the protest that interesting. The super wealthy tend not to be 'gawkers', they have more entertaining things to occupy their attention in life. Generally speaking it's middle-class folks that can't turn away from a spectacle. 

This is one of the problems with video, it doesn't always tell the real story.

It's also an example of why people need to think about the context in which they find themselves. It's almost absurd to say that walking out onto a balcony to see what's going on below is not a smart thing to do, but in the era of social media and video, you have to ask yourself that question now - you have to ask 'how would this look on video and could it be taken out of context?'

You don't want your face plastered over YouTube, especially if it's a misrepresentation of who you are. It may sound melodramatic, but those people in the video will probably end up being confronted by someone who recognized them from the video over the next few weeks. And even if it doesn't happen, I guarantee you they will see the YouTube video and will be worried about whether their safety is at any risk.

Wrong place, wrong time, wrong context and with a little video an average person can suddenly find themselves with a big problem on their hands.

Personally I think posting the video on YouTube was irresponsible and wrong. While the odds of danger are minimal the video nonetheless puts those people filmed in harms way.

I mean, just look at some of the comments on YouTube (yes, YouTube comments are often extreme, but rarely this extreme):

See if they are laughing when we stick their heads on pikes and their bodies hang from lamp posts.

Molotov cocktails should have been what they were sipping on!


Molotov Cocktail to that balcony. Burn the vermin.

Hope you scumbags on the balcony are ready for the guillotine.


It would be nice if we still lived in a world where you didn't have to worry about waking up one morning and finding yourself on YouTube being accused of mocking poor people, but alas, case in point, it can happen.



So when you find yourself in a circumstance where everyone has their iPhone out video taping things, stop and think for a second as to whether you want to be a part of the story. If not, then avoid the cameras, because social media can be dangerous.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...