Skip to main content

BCC interview - what was the BCC thinking?

If you haven't seen it, Alessio Rastani (an apparent stock trader) was inteviewed on the BBC and his interview has gone viral.



I'm sorry but this is just journalism at it's very worst.

First, I actually think it's a great interview and I agree (as do many others) with what Alessio said.  He went a little overboard in his description of Goldman Sachs, but all-in-all, he articulated a view that many economists are saying is very possible.

Here's the problem though. No one - and I mean NO ONE - knows who this guy is. There's no account of him working at any significant brokerage firm (he says he did, but refuses to disclose who). He simply appears to be a casual trader with only a few years under his belt at that.
How does someone with no significant credentials get on a national broadcast like the BBC?

I'll tell you exactly what happened (without even knowing the situation - so I could be wrong, but I doubt it).

The BBC probably had a guest booked, the guest cancelled last minute, BBC freaked out over having dead air, they pulled up the research list they had created when preparing the segment, they started calling down the list of potential guests they had initially researched (of which Alessio was one of them, probably as the result of an initial research some junior intern did), no one on the list was available and when they called Alessio he was.


Whoo Hoo segment saved (NOT)!

A junior staff member probably included him on the initial research list after stumbling on his FaceBook, YouTube site, or Web page and didn't research him further figuring he wasn't anywhere near the top of the list of potential guests they would approach for that segment.

And there you have it, a total unkonwn gets on a national BBC broadcast and makes headlines around the world.

Kudos to Alessio for keeping his composure through the interview. The guy should be a spokesperson because he's definitely calm under pressure (espeically given he knew the level of absurdity in suddenly finding himself speaking to millions of viewers).

Having said that though, just absolutely horrible journalism on the BBC's part.

Also, it was most likely a bad idea for Alessio to accept the interview. Yes, he got his 3:29 minutes of fame, but the PR he got won't do anything for him or his business because the story is now becoming that this guy should never have been interviewed in the first place.

So essentially he gets a ton of PR for saying the world is going to end, but then gets a second round of PR wherein everyone says that what this guy says doesn't matter. So does he really win from this?

Aside from being the talk of the town in his neighbourhood, I'd say he doesn't.  So drink up Alessio, enjoy the fleeting fame, and kudos on actually doing a good interview.
 
The only thing he could have done that would have brightened the spotlight even more would have been halfway through his interview saying to the anchor "Actually, you know, I need to stop here. I'm not qualified to make these statements at a national level. I have absolutely no clue how you guys let me on the air."

Now that may have very well got him on Late Night with David Letterman!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...