Skip to main content

YouTube is really losing its edge

The other day all the buzz was about a segment John Stewart did regarding the Ames Straw Poll in which he pointed out that Ron Paul, despite coming in second, was completely ignored by mainstream media.

I always find Ron Paul news interesting so I went on YouTube to see the Stewart clip. What did I find? Two things...

  1. There were at least three pages of 'spam' posts. These are videos that have the title relating to the topic, but when you click on the video there's either no video or it's a video of something else. A single user can post pages of spam so that to see the actual video you are looking for you have to search pages deep. 

    This spam tactic can be used by folks or organizations that want to surpress a video upon its initial releasing, knowing that people only really look at the first couple of pages of returns when searching and then give up.

    Over time the actually legit videos start getting bumped up as their hit rates rank them higher in the returns. But for initial surpression this has become common place.
  2. When I finally found a video for the Stewart segment it was on page four I believe and it wouldn't play. Instead the viewer simply showed the following:
This copyright issue is really starting to make YouTube suck. If they don't find a way of dealing with this they are going to start losing users.

Case in point, I went and Google searched for the Stewart clip (ironic that I have to use Google to find something that I can't find an a Google service - ie. YouTube).

I found the clip on a site called Dailymotion. They have all the features that YouTube has as well (as you can see by the fact that I've embedded the clip in this blog post right below).


Jon Stewart Defends Ron Paul & Exposes The... by SaveOurSovereignty

I don't know much about Dailymotion yet, but I'm going to start going there when I'm searching for a video in addition to YouTube.

That's bad news for YouTube. Just like MySpace fell off the face of the planet when Facebook came along, YouTube could very easily go from being king of the hill to completely irrelevant if people can't find videos on their site that they can find on other sites.

YouTube is still great when it comes to having your own YouTube channel, but the deterioration of YouTube in these other regards is something to watch. I predict that a few years down the road marketing and communications folks will have to manage multiple video sites to reach their audiences, they won't just able to create a YouTube channel and assume they are maximizing audience reach.

It may be premature to say, but the days where you could safely assume that 99 per cent of the viewing public was hanging out on YouTube may be coming to an end.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...