Skip to main content

Watch your facial expression when on TV (Greenspan trips up)

Alan Greenspan was on Meet The Press on Sunday and said something that, to date, no one associated with the USA's economic policy has said. Basically when asked about the downgrade to double-A status, Greenspan said the downgrade was silly. His reason? The US can print money therefore it can never default.

Or put in common speak, the US will never fail to pay off its credit card because it is the credit card company, ergo, if it's credit card is maxed out they can simply raise the limit on the credit card and use the increased limit to pay off the interest owed on that very same card. Hence they should be triple-A rated because a default is impossible.

This was a HUGE faux pas on Greenspan's part (it might be time for him to hang up the media interviews), essentially admitting that despite the trouble in the world being a direct result of unrestrained spending, their ultimate solution if it comes down to it is MORE printing of money and unrestrained spending (ie. debt).

As big a faux pas as this was, the video clip of this emphasizes an important element of PR, which is that messages aren't always verbal or text-based. Austin Goolsbee, who recently left his position as President Obama's Council of Economic Advisers chairman, was on the panel and said more with his body and facial language that words ever can.

It's not pronounced (so you should watch the video in full screen mode), but you can clearly see him take a restricted breath, his eyes widen and his jaw slightly clenches (mark 1.05 in the video).

You can almost see the thought bubble over his head thinking "Did he just say what I think he said? Argh, this is not good."




While the body language was very subtle (Goolsbee is well trained at media interviews) and the clip only two seconds in length, on a 40+ inch television trust me THAT was the message viewers received.

The message being that printing money and increasing debt to pay off debt is not a good thing and as such is a very touchy subject and must be talked about only with the greatest of care (something Greenspan clearly forget for a moment).

Little things like that, when they happen in front of a national audience, can play a huge role in eroding your messaging strategy.

In many ways, when Bush didn't react to 9/11 when he was in front of the kids, I think a lot of that was simply his media training kicking in. That when something shocks (and their are cameras around) you don't let it show in your facial or body expressions. You can see he is told the news at around the 1 minute mark and remains totally composed.



It's easy to control what you say when you are taken by surprise, it's much more difficult to control your non-verbal reaction. Just the slightest change in your breathing pattern can tell the audience everything they need to know.

The best strategy to use when presented with shocking information during an interview is to simply remember that interviews are a give and take process. That you don't have to jump in and respond instantly. As such, you can remain calm and collected and simply wait for your turn to talk and make whatever verbal corrections are required to control the damage.

The urge to react immediately is what gives rise to expressive body language. The act of holding yourself back gives off a wide variety of non-verbal queues. But if you are in a state of mind in which no matter what is said, you know you'll have a chance to respond, then you won't get that urge to react immediately to things (and your non-verbal body language will remain constant).

It's like a game of poker where you suddenly find yourself with four aces, the urge is to get excited over the fact that you are clearly going to win the hand presents itself. Yet, a good poker player has the same body expression whether they have four aces or a hand that's a bust. They remain calm and collected until after the game is over because they know, any body language they express on any given hand may be used by their opponent to judge future hands.

So no matter how taken by surprise you are, if you are in the mindset that you'll 'react' when, and only when, it's your turn to talk, you'll be in far greater control of the message your audience ultimately walks away with. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

A Look Back on 2017 / A Look Forward to 2018

Hard to believe it's been two years (and six books) since I started publishing. Thought I'd take a moment to look back on the journey, some of the highlights and what's in store for the future. Eyes Wide Open I had no idea what this publishing path would be like - I went in blind with nothing more than an interest in telling a story. It turned out to be way harder than I could have imagined. You'd think writing a book wouldn't be that difficult, but it is. It's not so much the book that readers see that's hard to produce, it's the ideas and writing that get left on the cutting room floor. But beyond the actual stories, learning Photoshop to do my own covers, understanding how to market my books, learning how to create print versions, and a dozen other things really opened my eyes to how much effort is required to get a book to market. Along the way I’ve had my moments where I questioned my sanity to put myself through the process. But...

Pew Research says Press Credibility In Decline

According to Pew Research negative opinions about the press are at an all time high. Definitely check out the source article because they have a ton of infographics that are worth looking at. The main graph related to the research is the one below: As you can see, the public no longer views the media as unbiased or fully accurate. There are dozens of variables that play in to this phenomena, but I think the biggest one is that the public has traditionally viewed the media as doing the people's work. Which is to say, they are kind of like the FBI, but they work for the people not the government. They are suppose to root out what is going on and inform the people so that society can hold politicians and corporations accountable (note the reoccuring theme of accountability that I talk about often in this blog, because it's a causal variable behind much of the issues in the world today). Over the past 15 or so years, the press has lost it's credibility with the p...