Skip to main content

What is grade six writing?

I read an article that made me laugh - 24 complex words—and their simpler alternatives - because to me the words were not that complicated. There's a general rule in writing for the public, which is try to keep it at a grade six level. Which simply means that if people are reading your writing and don't understand what you are saying, then you are not communicating effectively, hence the need to dumb it down.

So the words listed in this article (with suggestions for simplier words) included:

Advantageous — helpful
Ameliorate — improve
Cognizant — aware
Commence — begin, start
Commensurate — equal
Consolidate — combine
Deleterious — harmful
Disseminate — issue, send
Endeavor — try
Erroneous — wrong
Expeditious — fast
Facilitate — ease, help
Inception — start
Implement — carry out
Leverage — use
Optimize — perfect
Prescribed — required
Proficiencies — skills
Promulgate — issue or publish
Proximity — near
Regarding — about
Remuneration — reward, payment
Subsequently — after or later

I don't know, call me nuts, but those words don't seem that complicated. Ameliorate, commensurate, deleterious and promulgate I'll buy, but the rest don't seem complex to me.

Which brings up the question of what is grade six writing and can you go to far in dumbing down your writing?

I think you can (with the obvious caveat - I mean exception - being if you are writing something for actual kids in grade six, then yes, you want to keep it uber simple).

Additionally, writing at a grade six level doesn't mean you have to use all simple words. What it means though is you don't want to string together endlessly complicated sentences and words such that you have to have a PhD to understand what is being said (technology, academia and medicine are notorious - sorry, scratch that, they are 'well known' - for putting out news releases that no one can understand).

But most people can handle one or two complicated words if the context surrounding those words makes it clear what the word means (provided we are defining complicated words as being words such as proximity or prescribed).

In fact, I'd argue that one or two complicated words, such as caveat,  can actually be a good thing. If you are sending a news release to reporters, they may appreciate you using the 'right' word that best articulates what you are actually trying to say.

Anyway, words that I would consider too complicated for public writing might be:

explicate
inimical
muckracking
numinous
propitiate
resplendent
soporific

(and no I'm not going to define those words - look them up in a dictionary - learning is fun!)

So yes, too complicated does exist, but words like optimized should not be on that list. I think the simply rule to follow would be the following - Ask yourself, is the word you are using something that you would see regularly used in a newspaper? If yes, then go ahead and use it.

Use simpler phrasing if it doesn't water down your message, but don't over simplify just for the sake of it. If we truly were to write at a level that only kids understood, then before long we'd have a pretty unintelligable world (or should I say we'd have a pretty 'dumbed down' world - naw, unintelligable is a better word for what I'm trying to say). There's nothing wrong with writing for an adult audience (just don't assume that people have PhD's and don't use complicated words thinking it makes you look smart).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...