Skip to main content

Stop saying sorry (especially on Twitter)

Microsoft apparently apologized for a tweet they made about Amy Winehouse. Apparently they tweeted that users should go buy Amy Winehouse's latest album in honor of her memory and they linked to Zune (Microsoft's online music offering I guess - I thought Zune was just an mp3 player, didn't know they still had an online store for buying music associated with it).

They apologized for looking like they were taking commercial advantage of her death - she dies, they tell folks to go buy AW music to make a buck.

While it was probably a dumb tweet, there's no need to apologize for heaven's sake. If people don't want to buy her album, I'm sure they will just ignore the tweet. If they do want to buy the album, they will probably appreciate a link advising them how they can do so.

Not to mention, the biggest complement someone can pay to an artist is buying their art. I'm pretty sure Cobain, Winehouse, Joplin... would all be smiling if (the one good thing) their death resulted in was massive increases in people buying their art.

I'm not saying MSFT was smart in their Tweet, but realistically the issue here is Twitter's 140 characters. I bet you anything the short phrasing they had to use made it seem like they were simply driving people to Zune. With more characters they probably could have articulated more that they were just letting folks know where they could get her music if they so chose to honor her passing that way.

I'm all for apologizing. I think a lot of issues in life can be quickly resolved with a quick "Sorry about that." But man, people are jumping to apologies way to quickly now-a-days, which is then watering down the value of saying sorry.

In this particular case, MSFT should have simply stated (not apologized) "It was not our intent to offend anyone, simply to let our Zune users know where they could attain Amy Winehouse's music if they wanted to honor her memory in that fashion" (although I bet even that is over 140 characters).

And for people using Twitter who attack companies because they don't like a Tweet, grow up. How much can you say in 140 characters? Hardly anything. So you have to cut people/companies a little slack and 'assume' their intentions are good (unless they are using hate speech or something, where it's obvious their intentions are bad). 

Comments

  1. Saying sorry hurts? I came across this video which reminded me of your post. If you're going to ask me though, I think saying sorry means that you're brave enough to admit your mistakes. http://youtu.be/-o-OTQXc5pY

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Sandy,

    Saying sorry is fine where appropriate. I probably should have used a different headline for this blog entry.

    I just feel that corporations are pulling out the 'sorry' card far too often. Half the time I don't think they actually are sorry, they just say it defuse a situation rather than stand behind their actions.

    I think sorry is appropriate if you bump in to someone, are rude to someone, hurt someone's feelings, etc.

    But saying sorry every time someone doesn't like something devalues the meaning behind the word. For instance, if someone doesn't like the shoes I'm wearing, I'm not going to say 'I'm sorry you don't like them."

    And that's what I see a lot of corporations doing via Twitter. Every time a small minority don't like something, corporations are quick to say 'sorry'.

    If they really meant it that would be fine I guess, but I don't think most of them do. It's just become a convenient way to defuse a situation.

    I'm for apologizing when you've committed a wrong, but not simply to sweep a situation under the rug.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...