Skip to main content

Got Milk? How about Got Any Common Sense?

Over at PR Breakfast Club, Keith Trivitt had a blog entry that caught my attention - Latest ‘Got Milk?’ Campaign Shows Worst of Marketing.

Basically the California Milk Processor Board ran a 'Got Milk?" campaign where the theme was that milk helps women with PMS and as a result helps men who have to deal with women with PMS. The microsite associated with the campaign can be found at www.gotdiscussion.org

This kind of reminds me of the time Nike ran a commercial where a woman was being attacked by Michael Myers. That commercial got banned, but I believe they also have a commercial where a woman gets mugged on the street, but outruns her mugger. Or I think it was actually a woman was being chased by a mugger, but by the end of the commercial there isn't a mugger and the message was that with Nike shoes you run like you are running for your life (although I can't find that particular ad on YouTube).




Anyway, "Got Milk' and 'Just Do it' are perhaps the two most recognizable brand phrases in the world. Not sure why companies mess around with their brand once they've hit the motherload. I suppose it's simply that creative urge to keep pushing the brand upwards and onwards and 'fresh'. But at a certain point, when you've hit gold, sometimes you should stop and be a little careful about messing with perfection.

It's not that these commercials aren't funny within the right context, but that they break so aggressively from the brand sentiment created in all their previous advertisements. As a result people, the public in general sees them and thinks 'WTF?'

And tying milk to PMS just makes no sense to me. People drink milk for the calcium and having strong bones - and with their cereal. If they wanted to be funny what they should have done was maybe run a series of ads that fictionalized what the world would look like without Milk. Some bizarro earth where milk disappeared and everyone was in casts, their teeth were falling out and they were using orange juice with their cereal and making sour faces over the taste.

The same thing goes with the Nike commercial. I actually think the Nike commercial was kind of innovative (mind you I like horror movies), but it was such a departure from their 'inspiration' theme. The commercial probably would have been more appropriate for something like Monster drinks.

So there you have it, the experiation date on Got Milk? just ran out and now it tastes funky and sour.

Hopefully they pull these ads, bury any graphics and videos they have, go silent for a while, and relaunch something more traditional (or at least more interesting) down the road.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...