Skip to main content

Apple to make TVs - down the path of irony?

So Apple will start making televisions soon. I guess it's not that much of a surprise. When you are dominating the market why not continue branching out and dominating other markets? That is after all how you keep profits growing.

Short term I think this is a great move for Apple and will generate even further PR glory. The ultimate model is for intelligent connectivity between all digital, internet-connected devices right? Have a television that is designed to interact with all your other Apple products is a giant leap in that direction (although personally I just view a television as a giant computer monitor at this point - at least for those of us who have already gone all-Internet for our digital needs).

Long term though I don't know if this is a great move for Apple. The Apple brand has always been that of rogue innovator. Breaking barriers and creating products that march to their own drummer. The problem with branching out in to more mainstream markets (especially ones that are quick to commoditize) is that consumers stop associating your brand with revolutionary technology. They begin to see you as just another big, faceless technology company.

I have to wonder if Apple is heading towards a state of irony. Their message has always been for consumers to rebel against technology that tries to control them...




And yet, as Apple branches out in to more and more areas, that is exactly the trap Apple is leading consumers in to.

The same phenomena is starting to happen with Google. You use to be able to go to YouTube and find clips of just about anything. I went to search for a 'trapper keeper' clip from an old South Park video (because it kind of applies to Apple's out-of-control growth) but you can hardly find a single South Park clip on YouTube anymore.

As companies grow exponentially it becomes harder and harder to remain true to their brand. YouTube is quickly losing it's position as the world's repository for all things video. More and more when you go to YouTube you can't find what you were hoping to find (whereas a couple years ago you almost always did).

Apple's move in to televisions will be hugely successful at first I would predict. But I also predict that moving beyond the PC / Mobility market and in to the more commercial television market will in many ways strip the excitement and prestige the brand currently enjoys.

The reason this is SUCH a big deal is that Apple is not as unique as everyone thinks. The only reason its competitors can't dethrone it is that it's brand is so strong. Consumers love Apple. Should they start to see Apple in the same light as Sony, RIM, LG, HP, etc. - then it's conceivable that they could start losing ground across their entire portfolio of products.

It will be interesting to see how it all plays out. Getting to the top and staying at the top tend to be two different things. I personally wonder if Apple can protect its brand as it tries to grow ever larger.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...