Skip to main content

A Pretty Cool Site - CareerBliss - Implications for HR and PR

Stumbled on this site the other day and I think it's pretty cool. CareerBliss is a site where people can post their views (annonymously) on the company they work for. They don't even have to work at the company anymore, they can post on previous employers.


Now, obviously the first thing that comes to mind is how can you tell if a post is even by someone that actually worked at the company? I mean, what is to stop competitors from posting things about their competition. I don't have the answer to that.

I think however that these types of sites ultimately follow some law of averages or something. Sure, some comments might be intentionally malicious. Just like some might be intentionally overly positive (I can see companies posting glowing reviews even if they aren't true). But on the whole, when all the comments get averaged out, you hope to get a rough proximity of the truth.

If the site fails in this regard, then it's quickly abandoned by people as a trust worthy service. 


I find ratemds.com (a site that rates doctors - and just like CareerBliss it is annonymous) very useful and accurate. Overall the ratings seem to be in-line with the experience you're likely to have.

Sites like these put a whole new emphasis on how internal operations impact your external brand. It use to be that if you had top notch marketing and PR that you could have quite a big gap between what the external world thought of you and what your employees thought of you.

While Twitter and blogs threatened that outside-inside paradigm, they were limited by the fact that ultimately your tweets or blog comments could be traced back to you. Not to mention you can only do so much damage with a limited following (investors, new employees, current employees, etc., are unlikely to even find the blog/twitter reference).


But with sites like CareerBliss, as far as I can tell, there's no way to trace back who actually made a comment. As such, it's purely an open forum for people to 'leak' what they think. Which means, your employees have the ability to severly damage your brand.

Who today doesn't go and check imdb before watching a movie? I know I don't watch anything before checking what rating people have given it.

I can see a site like CareerBliss really taking off and that means companies need to start thinking about how their internal operations play in to their external brand strategies. Spending millions developing an external brand while spending nothing on creating a workplace that employees enjoy could create a scenario where the millions you spent external go down the drain as employees tell the world who your company really is!

As I've mentioned in previous posts, it's time for PR and HR to work more closely together, because synchronicity between your external perception and internal perception must match up or you are at risk of destroying your brand.

This is also why I think Google has such a strong brand. Their internal culture seems to support the traits associated with its external brand, resulting in congruence wherein publics trust the brand impression being made.

(Oh and just one last thought. This looks like the perfect type of company for LinkedIn to acquire. You drop CareerBliss in to the LinkedIn service and it could easily redefine corporate reputations over night.).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...