Skip to main content

RIM disappoints again

Well RIM got trashed today in after hours, down 10 per cent based on lower earnings forecast.

Glad I sold the stock a while ago.

Can't imagine how badly it would have been hit if it didn't have things like tablets hitting the market, which shows that it's at least trying to stay competitive.

From a PR / marketing perspective I think RIM has lost its way.

Even when you go to their Web site, it's so dark and gloomy. Maybe I'm getting old and my eyes don't adjust the way they should, but using a black background and medium dark grey text for navigation just feels down right gloomy. I have to squint to read most of the text.

And while RIM has two central sites, www.rim.com and www.blackberry.com, one for corporate and one for product, only the product site has social media options (which are displayed as the tiniest icons possible in the bottom right corner).

They've obviously tried to sex themselves up (the old site was very boring) but fuzzy images, dark motifs and general clutter give the signal that from a marketing and PR perspective the helicopter is in a tailspin. Not to mention the disconnect in the sites... the RIM corporate site, even in their news section, has no social networking options (and I'd argue it's more important to have them there, than anywhere else).

What did give me a laugh though is how on their product site's homepage (top left corner) there are social networking share options, including Twitter. Why in the world would I want to tweet the url of blackberry's homepage?

Anyway, take a look at Apple's homepage and RIM's and tell me there isn't a galaxy of difference between the two. I like RIM more than Apple, but if I were 20-something and looking at devices by visiting different sites, I'd run away from RIM and run right to Apple.

I just hope RIM gets its marketing act together and hope that it's not too late for that to happen.  I feel bad for the PR folks also because I'll tell you this much, I'd rather be pitching reporters and sending them to a site that looks like Apple's than sending them to the RIM site (where they will get a migraine trying to navigate looking for information).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...