Skip to main content

Oh the little details...

So the Ontario government sent me a brochure the other day about electricity prices and how they will be changing. This is in response to the new time-of-use pricing model they will be putting in to effect.

It's a very simple, full-color, five-page brochure which is mostly images (if you live in Ontario you've probably seen it).  Well, it's actually 10-pages with five in English and five in French.

Ontario has just over 13-million people so (and I'm totally guessing here) this brochure probably went out to say four-million households - let's be ultra conservative and cut that projection down to two-million households.

Now, let's say each of these pamphlets cost 50-cents, which I think is a very conservative figure for 10-pages of full color  - that would put the cost at a million bucks. This doesn't include the cost of mailing it all out (even if it only be man-hours).

So while receiving a pamphlet in the mail might seem like no big deal, in this case it is. That little pamphlet is over a million-dollar deal.

Ok Rob, get to the point already you might be saying.

The point of this blog entry is how PR (and marketing) is not easy and one of the easiest things to mess up is the little details. The pie charts below is the first thing you see when you open the brochure...


As you can see, in the middle pie chart the percentages add up to 101 per cent.

Now, keep in mind, on a million-dollar project this brochure (which takes about 2-5 minutes to read, it's not big at all) was probably proofed at least a dozen times by a dozen people. And yet, no one picked up that the percentages added up to 101 per cent.

This is a perfect example of how hard PR/marketing is, how easy it is to make a mistake. And it's almost always the most simple errors that occur because when proofing people think that there's no way someone could have gotten the pie chart numbers wrong, so they just glance over the figures (clearly not a single person bothered to add the numbers up).

In the age of twitter and facebook people think that content creation only takes a few minutes. But the reality is that content creation takes time and effort and focus and it truly is a skill.

Had this been a brochure for a business pitching services to a customer, they very well might add up the figures, see that there was an error and choose the competitor instead figuring that if the figures are wrong then what else that is being said isn't accurate?

Is this is the end of the world? Of course not.

But it's a great example of how the little details matter and people do notice them. The editing/proofing process is often rushed simply because it comes at the end and deadlines are usually rushing people along. But it's essentially that when you think you have a final product, that you stop and really proof it before you send it to the printers. Tell yourself that there must be at least one mistake that you've missed and then search for that mistake like you are playing 'Where's Waldo?' - because trust me, it's there.



What's always frustrated me is how people generally fail to appreciate good proofing. I use to work with a guy who was an excellent proofer. I mean, he would catch the smallest of mistakes, it was great. Nothing, and I mean absolutely nothing, that I was putting out the door would go out until I had him read it.  Which was kind of him, because it wasn't actually his job to proof content, he was just good at it and cared about what we were putting out.

And yet, I don't think people ever truly understood or appreciated how valuable his gatekeeping was to the company.

So while it may be a thankless job at times, you still have to make it the highest priority to ensure that what you put out there has no mistakes. Because a simple mistake is a message in itself... it says 'We make simple mistakes' ... which is not what you want your stakeholders thinking.

So to all PR folks, find yourself a good proof reader. Consult your colleagues. They don't have to work in your department to help you out. But whatever you do, find that one person in your organization who has an uncanny ability to spot errors. Odds are they won't mind helping and will save you from simple errors such as pie charts that add up to 101 per cent. Don't trust that just because you and ten other people have proofed it that it's good to go... odds are the people proofing it are thinking the same thing! Find that person who has a laser focus for details, they are worth their weight in gold.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...