Skip to main content

I love this image

David Armano has a great blog and I stumbled across an image he designed that I thought was amazing...

I think this image hits the nail on the head. Basic brand building, from a PR perspective (and ideally from a marketing perspective also) is all about positive interactions, consistency, credibility, authenticity and trust.

This is why I've always considered PR to be one part technical skills, one part hard work and one part art.  I say art because you can give 100 PR people the same task and end up with 100 different results along a spectrum of bad to great.

The angles you take in pitching reporters, the manner in which you discuss the potential of a story with a reporter who is interest, the way in which you manage your contacts, the manner in which you prep your spokespersons, and the list goes on... there are so many variables that are intricately tied to the unique style of each PR person.

It's funny, I recently had a friend tell me about a compliment they received in their job. They have a very high stress, deadline intensive, herding cats type of job. The compliment they received was how they were able to get so many people to work together smoothly, people who normally dislike each other and don't work well together at all.

Yet this trait that was complimented would never show up in a job description. No one would ever hire someone based on this trait. And yet, it's probably the most valuable element to this person's success. Yes, technically they are top notch and they work their butt off, but it's this individual factor that makes the huge difference in their work environment.

PR is similar. Can you really build positive interactions, develop credibility, communicate authenticity and establish trust simply through traditional PR techniques? I would argue you can't, not through technique alone. I'd argue there is an element to PR that simply can't be taught and it rests in a PR person's style across dozens of critical variables such as honesty, respect, empathy, critical thinking ability, and creative predispositions just to name a few.

Anyway, loved the image and think that it should be on the wall of anyone doing PR. Ask yourself - is the way you are doing PR, from how you answer the phone to how you send an email, exemplifying the traits that will lead to brand loyalty?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...