Skip to main content

How many tweets is too many tweets?

Ok, I love Twitter as much as the next guy, but the question does need to be asked - how many tweets (per day) is too many tweets?

I follow a variety of folks and continue to add people every day.

Some folks are a pleasure to follow while others are spamming Twitter endlessly. I often times open up tweetdeck and see 20 entries from someone posting over a couple of hours and think 'oh come on!' I have to scan through their tweets to read the tweets from other people that I'm following and it can be very annoying.

Then there are others who will post pointless tweets like "wow it's sunny outside."   Really? You just had to tell the world that?

What gets frustrating is that I don't want to unfollow some of these folks, because I'm interested in what they are up to and I'm also often interested in many of their tweets.

So how many tweets are too many? 

In my opinion, anything more than five tweets a day is too much. If I'm following 30 people and each posts five tweets a day that's 150 tweets that I have to scan through. If I'm following 100 people, that's 500 tweets a day I have to scan through.

500 tweets a day is too much. It's not even the time it takes to scan through the tweets it's the fact that it becomes very easy to miss tweets from people that you are interested in.

And heaven forbid you take a vacation for a week and don't check Twitter and come back to 30,000 tweets over the past week.

So what's the solution?

The solution to me is fairly simple. If you are posting 20 tweets a day STOP tweeting and start a blog! Alternatively, open two twitter accounts, one that you use for normal twitter posts and another that you use for whatever is generating 20 tweets a day (which is most often news items that people find interesting).  So have one account for YOU and another account for the 20 Britney Spears items you retweet every day, that way I don't have to get swamped by Britney Spears items when really I'm more interested in what you are up to.

As for Twitter, it would be great if they allowed folks to set a daily limit on how many tweets they want to receive from any given Twitter account. This would almost create a standard. If you could set your account to follow say 'five tweets max per user' then people twittering would self restrict their tweets knowing that many people following them probably won't read anything more than five tweets a day.


From what I can tell most people seem to tweet in the order of 2-5 tweets a day, which is great. It's the people posting 15-30 tweets a day (and more) that should ask themselves whether it's a bit overkill.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...