Skip to main content

The Cable to DSL switch

[indulge me this non-PR related post]...

So as those following my blog know I've recently switched from cable to DSL and I'm now a TekSavvy customer (one of the ISPs that run off the Bell network).

So how has my experience going from Rogers to TekSavvy been? Overall I have to say I'm super glad I made the switch.

I can't explain it but I'm on a 5mbps download DSL service and it runs FASTER than my 10mbps download service that I had with Rogers. For downloading media they are about the same speed, but when it comes to the Web - loading Web pages or watching YouTube videos - I find it much faster than when I was with Rogers.

So thumbs way way up!  I'm paying half as much, not sacrificing speed and getting three times the 'cap' - I can now download 300 gigs a month for 36 bucks after tax (versus 96 gigs a month for 60 bucks with Rogers).

On the negative side, the independent ISPs still have a long way to go on tech support. When I had problems with Rogers they always fixed the problem.

With DSL, I had some initial set up problems and a wacky issue with the connection dropping with my router and while TekSavvy tried to solve it, they weren't able to. Luckily, I got some help from someone that knew something about routers and it turned out to be a super simple issue resulting from my PC's firewall.

Now, TekSavvy doesn't troubleshoot router issues (but Rogers would have).

Don't get me wrong, TekSavvy's reps are great. Very friendly, happy to help you, and very patient. But with this particular issue weren't able to help me fix the problem. And while they may not consider routers a part of their tech support, I as a customer simply want someone to help me get on the internet (and to me, anything that could be preventing that should be in the area of tech support). 

Other than router issues, getting connected was a breeze. But I have to emphasize, switching from Rogers to someone like TekSavvy is probably only advisable for folks that are use to resolving tech issues, which cancels out a lot of folks (especially baby boomers).

Now if you don't use a router, then I think everything would be pretty simple and anyone could make the switch without much concern.

Now that I'm up and running though I think I'll be a life-long TekSavvy customer and to be honest I'm kicking myself that I didn't make the switch years ago!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...