Skip to main content

Sometimes the old tricks are the best tricks

So Stephen Hawking has caught up to Nietzsche and basically proclaimed that God is dead....well, not dead exactly, but something that is not required for the universe to exist or be what it is. In his new book, which I haven't had a chance to read yet, The Grand Design, apparently he argues that the universe most likely came about through spontaneous creation.

Our conclusion: This (the universe) can all be explained through science and we don’t need God to explain how the universe came into existence or why the laws of nature are what they are,” said Mlodinow. (Mlodinow wrote the book with Hawking).

From a PR perspective you have to give it to Hawking, he knows how to generate interest. I'm not really sure why God factors in to the discussion if it is purely a scientific overview of the universe. Once you toss God in there you are now mixing science with sociological, anthropology, philosophy and mythological variables and belief systems.

But that's why you have to give it to Hawking, nothing sells books like taking a good old-fashion jab at people's religious belief systems and stoking the fires of the old religion versus science debate.

I'll read the book, but I suspect I'll probably end up having a good chuckle as a variety of scientific 'theories' attempt to dethrone theological 'theories'. I'm a fan of science, as well as philosophy and theology, and as far as I can tell no one has been able to explain how any of this came to be. Last time I checked no one knows what came before the big bang. Everything is theoretical in that sense.

So attempting to replace a theological theory (God) with a scientific theory (spontaneous creation) seems to be asking people to take the same 'leap of faith' that they are asked to take when it comes to religion.

Kind of reminds me of the scene from the movie Contact



At the end of the day I suspect Hawking will sell a ton of books, religious organizations will also probably garner tons of media coverage as they dispute Hawking's 'theories', and in the end we'll end up right back where we started with most people believing in God but at the same time acknowledging that we don't have all the answers as to how the universe works or why it exists in the first place.

But sometimes the old tricks are the best tricks, and Hawking has pulled out the oldest trick of them all by using someone else's popularity (God) to elevate interest in what he (Hawkings) has to say.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...