Skip to main content

Skype’s IPO Filing, By The Numbers

Skype filled for its IPO recently and the WSJ had a nice summary of the numbers associated with Skype.

The issue with Skype obviously is how do you make big bucks on a low cost service. You have to do that by having a massive consumer base.

In telecom we use to talk about the race to zero... that voice services will eventually become free through the commidifaction of sending voice as data packets and competitive market forces (which increase exponentially when voice is seen as a data transmission).

Anyhoo... all the techno mumbo jumbo aside... the big problem for skype is that most people like to move about while they are on the phone and don't like being tethered to their computer.

I think if Skype takes off, it will do so in the mobile world where users use skype on their smartphones to avoid cellular charges.

The biggest barrier however is that at some point Skype is going to have to start publicizing itself as more than just a PC / Smartphone app for making phone calls. Right now what does Skype stand for? It almost has an anti-brand.... which most free services tend to develop. Their brand is less about something and is defined more by under cutting traditional providers.

But if low-cost alternative alone were enough to ignite consumers passion then Hyundai would be the leading auto manufacturer.

Nope, I think for Skype to truly become a cash cow, aside from playing heavily in the mobile space, it has to define itself to its customers.

Check out what they've done with LG... VERY cool....



While Skype has done an amazing job of remaining interesting to the technology crowd, it still has yet to catch the interest of mainstream society. It's still seen as a PC application to avoid long distance charges. And that's not surprising... mainstream consumers tend to understand hardware devices, not software.

I hope when they go IPO they throw some marketing dollars to revamp the Skype proposition and put some effort in to articulating to mainstream consumers why the Skype train is one they need to climb on board.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...