Skip to main content

Interesting Legalize Marijuana Video

I have to say first and foremost that I love graphic and multimedia designers. I think a creative graphic designer is literally worth their weight in gold. A compelling visual can drastically shift people's perspectives on a given issue.

Which brings me to the following video that was created to obviously drum up support for the legalization of marijuana.



I don't really have a hard stance on the issue myself, although I lean towards legalization as a result of my libertarian mindset. Tax revenue and regulation is probably a better scenario than law enforcement expenditures and incarceration costs and the unregulated state of buying something on the street - not to mention the harms associated with labeling people criminals.

 But I can also appreciate the slippery slope argument - if you legalize pot, then what's next, cocaine?

Anyway, I think the whole thing would be a non issue if we lived in a society where people didn't feel the need to self medicate.

But all that aside... the reason I thought it interesting to highlight this video is that it shows that marketing / PR is crucial in any hearts and minds campaign. To date we tend to get experts on each side telling folks to be afraid or telling them that there is nothing to fear.

This is the first time I've come across a well crafted video that doesn't take a debate stance, but rather attempts to connect with the audience on an emotional level.

We all want peace in the world right?

And that's what the video does. It ties the notion of peace and happiness with marijuana being legal. And it works. By the end you start thinking that maybe marijuana should be legal.

The irony however is that you could easily create a very similar video and show people living healthy, happy lives drug free. 

And that's the important point... that how you present your position, the emotions you tap in to in your audience, can have a significant impact on how your message is received.

Anyway, forget whether pot should or shouldn't be legal... this is just a good example of how creative, innovative messaging can have an impact. In less than a month this video already has over 500,000 views.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...