Skip to main content

Another feature story on dropping cable tv

Read story here

Yet another story, this time in the New York Post, about dropping cable tv for the internet.

Yet again, it's disappointing to see the story not mention any of the things you need to truly enjoy all the benefits of cable tv without cable tv (heck, you get more through the internet than you'd ever get with any cable package). 

I was shocked to hear in the story of 20 somethings sitting around the dinner table watching tv on their laptop.

On your laptop?!!! Guys, what the heck are you doing?  In the most basic of set ups at least hook your laptop up to the tv using an HDMI cable.

Another disappointment...yet again Netgear gets no mention - argh, come on guys, get the PR machine going.

Anyway, this article, as many others, references sites like Hulu and Netflix, which clearly tells you those two companies have their PR game-face on and are out there staying connected to reporters (because realistically neither Hulu or Netflix are the future of Internet-based television, although Netflix has a chance of doing ok over the next five years.. but 10 years out, forget about it.)

On a side note, I think I'm two months in to having no cable tv and I'm LOVING it!  My internet/cable bill has gone from $130 to $55 a month and I haven't missed anything.

I could go to ADSL off a Bell reseller for probably $40 a month, but I've enjoyed Rogers customer service so I've kept my Internet business with them.

I'm surprised to see that articles such as these are not highlighting the massive shift that is going to happen in the near future. All you have to do is look at the basic annual cost associated with operating off the internet versus traditional services.  For example, a typical set up for most people might look like the following:

Traditional Set Up
Land-line Phone Bill - $40/month
Cellular - $40/month
Internet - $60/month
Cable tv - $75/ month
total = $215/month

To get all the same services (often with more features), but running them off the internet.....

Internet Set Up (in the near future)
Land-line Phone bill - $5/month (skype)
Cellular - $20/month (use Skype on the cellular and pay only data charges, while using your cellular identity for 911 connectivity)
Internet - $60/month (no change)
Cable tv - $0/month
Total =  $85/month (and hey, if you went with ADSL your monthly total would only be $65/month versus $215/month through a traditional set up)

So basically people are paying $215/month when they could get the exact same thing for $85 (or even $65) a month. 

Do the math and for 12 months you're looking at $2,580 versus $1,020 bucks (a $1,500 savings every year).

This is why the shift is inevitable. It's disappointing that reporters aren't getting this basic reality that the Internet is going to replace traditional services (and save people an absurd amount of money). And we're just talking tv and phone services... don't get me in to all the other traditional services it will disrupt.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...