Skip to main content

Online content - the apple factor

Well, I'm a few days in to having no (cable) television and I'm absolutely loving it!

It's amazing how much content is available online. Basically the only reason I had cable television was to watch Fast Money and Mad Money on CNBC. But to my surprise, both shows are fully available on CNBC's web site. It's amazing how quickly the content is put online - I think it might be almost real-time - but definitely within a few hours of broadcast.

So what's the new paradigm that I'm experiencing?

I have a little CNBC app on my iPod and with a simple click I can watch both Fast Money and Mad Money on my iPod. The video quality is excellent and there's absolutely no lag or buffering as the video plays. I can choose which segments of the show I want to watch (allowing me to skip segments on say Gold, which I tend not to care about listening to). 


If I want Canadian news, the National (and most CBC shows) are available online also on CBC's Web site.


I can definitely see the huge value in tablets now.... they are basically mini portable television screens (among other things).

The more I 'live on the net' the more it becomes crystal clear that the internet will be the future for all content and information and entertainment exchange. We're truly there now... you can live on the net and still be 'plugged in' to everything going on in the world.

Which also got me thinking. In much the same way that RSS feeds aggregate online text-based content, if someone came out with an application or browser plug-in that aggregated online video content from other sites they could make a killing.

I'd love to have a central browser where I could add all my fav sites that I get video content from in a simple interface. In a way 'bookmarks' kind of do this, but I still have to visit the sites to see what's new. Something that aggregated content into a single interface and updated you on new video content available on various sites would be awesome.

From a PR perspective I'm going to go in search of the best apps for monitoring the online world, because it's going to become ever more important to be able to do so quickly and simply. Google news alerts are fantastic and pick up almost every mention of an organization, but you still want that ability of knowing what is being said in general across hundreds of media sites (without having to click on hundreds of bookmarks every day).

Will update when I finish my search.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Post: Where Can You Buy My Books?

Interested in purchasing one of my books? Below are the links that will take you to the right place on Amazon. A Manufactured Mind On Amazon On Kobo On Barnes and Noble On iTunes Obey On Amazon On Kobo  On B&N  On iTunes  The Fall of Man Trilogy Days of Judgment (Book One) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes System Crash (Book Two) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes A Fool's Requiem (Book Three) On Amazon On Kobo On B&N On iTunes

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...

More evidence of the Internet Revolution

Bell ushers in new era with CTV deal  So Bell has purchased CTV.  Not really that big a deal under normal circumstances, except when you realize why they did it... Driving convergence this time, the Internet-enabled mobile devices such as smart phones and computer tablets are threatening home television’s lock on viewers. Bell, like its rivals, wants to offer more content to its subscribers, however they receive the signal. Viewers are increasingly interested in watching their favourite shows on their phones while they ride the bus or sit in the park, and the cable and phone companies that have served as middle men between viewers and broadcasters were in danger of being marginalized. You know what sort of worries me about this kind of acquisition? It's clearly an attempt to own (control) content. When they say marginalized what they really mean is service providers being nothing more than dumb pipes - providing connectivity to the internet and nothing more. As ...