Skip to main content

AP IMPACT: BP spill response plans severely flawed

Wowzers.

You can read the AP story here if you already haven't read it.

BP stock nose dived 15 percent today (long before this story hit the wire... it will be interesting to see what happens tomorrow).

I was watching Fast Money tonight and they had a guest on who made the brash call that he believes BP will cease to exist in the near future.

I have to say, I wouldn't be surprised.  BP shares are down around 60 percent since 2007. I love a depressed stock, but even I won't touch BP in it's current state.

This (man-made) natural disaster is quickly mounting into a PR disaster of truly epic proportions - with the President essentially promising to kick some ass, the oil spill estimates constantly growing, the disaster plan clearly nothing more than a creative writing task to satisfy regulators, talk about changing laws just so they can prosecute BP as harshly as possible and politicians (in response to citizens) calling for blood - I just don't see how BP gets itself out of this mess now.

You run down the checklist of typical actions to take and none of them will have a containing effect in my opinion:

- fire the CEO? fine, but the oil will keep spilling.

- Commit 100 billion (available as of tomorrow) from BP's coffers to clean up the mess and repair the damage? I suppose you could, but your stock price would crash even harder.

- Have the CEO live at ground zero? To be honest, it's not worth the risk to his life at this point (which I think he'd be doing if he gets anywhere near the general populous).

So what is there left to do?

Despite the seemingly hopelessness of this situation, I don't believe things are ever hopeless. There's the old saying that it's never to late to turn things around.

I'd encourage you to read this mock address someone wrote that is what they think Tony Hayward should give (CEO of BP). You can read it here.

I think at this point, the only thing left for BP to do is something radical. Beyond all of the above (and the suggestions I made in a previous post)... at this point I think they have to create within BP a social responsibility division that audits corporate activities and reports on any malfeasance. The division, while paid for by BP, would have to at the same time be an independent body.

Essentially, for lack of a better analogy, the equivalent of a parole officer who would monitor BP and report quarterly that BP has not broken any laws or behaved in an unethical manner. A division that would supersede the lawyers and even the CEO himself.

This type of over-the-top commitment to transparency and corporate responsibility might just save them from the worst case scenario.

That said, I don't expect any of these suggestions will take place.

Why?

Because the people on whose watch this took place have bigger problems. Right now a lot of them know they will face an investigation with the possibility of criminal charges - that's what's keeping them up at night at this point (I would guess).

My prediction: They will cap the oil spill in late August, the CEO will be fired, a new CEO will come in and systematically hand over anyone tied to this to the government. The new CEO will throw himself on the sword of public opinion and ask for time to restructure and develop plans to guide BP in the future. The world will breath a sigh of relief... until the next crisis hits (who knows what that will be) and everyone will forget about BP.

Although, I wouldn't be surprised to see a collation of international government forces combine to place BP in government receivership, essentially nationalize (globalizing?) BP under government powers.

It would be a great PR move for governments (who are almost as hated by the public as company's like BP). It would be seen as evidence that 'elected governments' still have the ability to take matters in to their own hands when free market entities run amuck.

In an ironic twist, they would be seen as the rescuers that tamed 'the beast' - which BP had hoped would be how it would be seen in capping the oil spill. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Morgan Freeman Botches Reddit IAmA - Black Eye on PR

For those not familiar with Reddit it's basically a forum where people post interesting things on a wide variety of subjects. Postings gain popularity when people 'up vote' them and become more visible in their particular subreddit (a subreddit is simply a subject category, like politics or videos). One of Reddit's most popular subreddits is the IAmA subreddit - which allows reddit users to ask questions of various people. Over three million people subscribe to IAmA, which is also widely used by celebrities. An IAmA can last a couple hours during which Redditors (the term Reddit users call themselves) can ask the person doing the IAmA questions. The term "IAmA" comes from the concept of "I Am A doctor, ask me anything", "I Am A movie star, ask me anything" - you get the drift. IAmA's are not just for celebrities, lots of common folks do them as well. Recently Morgan Freeman did an IAmA  and it turned into a PR mess. To make a lo...

Mainstream versus Alternate Media - Where is the news now-a-days?

It's well known that CNN has been suffering an exodus of viewers, losing over half their viewership over the past couple of years. Yet Fox News has not lost viewers, but has increased its viewership slightly. It's an odd phenomena given that Fox news is clearly biased in their coverage. Mind you, so is CNN according to many. But I'd suggest it comes down to something much more simple.  While Fox may be holding its ground, the rise of alternative media is taking off where CNN left off - a focus on hard news. For those of the under 40 crowd, that's what they are looking for, NEWS. The simplest way to highlight the difference between mainstream media and alternative media is to take a look at their homepages and the stories they highlight. It becomes very clear why people are turning away from CNN and turning to alternative media. Let's look at five media sites and their homepage (click on pictures to enlarge): CNN Feature stories: CNN heroes Top t...

E-cigarettes: A PR battle Health Canada cannot win?

So I've now been using an e-cigarette (e-cig) for two months and thought I'd talk a bit about how I see the upcoming battle between Health Canada and e-cigs going. First though, let's do a quick overview of what exactly an e-cig is. Basically an e-cig vaporizes liquid that contains nicotine. The vapor is then inhaled. People who use e-cigs are called vapers (not smokers). Because the liquid is atomized (ie. vaporized), not burned the way tobacco is, vapers do not consider themselves 'smokers' in anyway. An e-cig is comprised of basically three components: The tank - this is the component that holds the juice (sometimes referred to as e-juice or e-liquid). The atomizer - this a coil and wick unit that atomizes the juice. When the coil is heated (from the battery) it atomizes the juice that has soaked into the wick. The battery - batteries for e-cigs come in various capacities (some last 8 hours, others 40+ hours, depending on their size).  The ba...